- Hayek moneyという元ネタ
- 無担保型stablecoinの高い壁
- Ampleforthという悪堕ち
美術産業へのコロナ関連支援はデジタルアーカイブを基軸にすべき
Background vector created by Harryarts – www.freepik.com
- 下策: 美術関係者を対象とした給付金交付
- 中策: 美術館のデジタルアーカイブ推進
- 上策: 中策 + リーディングミュージアム私案
A Brief Introduction of Art Industry
- 現代美術を産業として捉えた際の基本的な構造を図示
- 各プレイヤーの短期的な目的は (もちろん) 利益を上げること
- しかし彼らの最終的な目的は自身が関わる作品や動向の名を美術史に刻むこと
経済学メモ: Dixit-Stiglitz aggregatorの気持ち
- 3種類以上の財を扱えるから便利
- 各財の差別化度合いを調整出来るから便利
- 投入量と集計量が同じになるから便利
「アート思考」は歪んで伝わっているのではないか？
- アート思考の定義について原著を確認してみた
- 原著はアートの効能について特に言及していない
- 新たな美の普及へのコミットが真のアート思考だろう
Ito and Tanaka (2019) “Token-Curated Registry with Citation Graph”
Abstract: In this study, we aim to incorporate the expertise of anonymous curators into a token-curated registry (TCR), a decentralized recommender system for collecting a list of high-quality content. This registry is important, because previous studies on TCRs have not specifically focused on technical content, such as academic papers and patents, whose effective curation requires expertise in relevant fields. To measure expertise, curation in our model focuses on both the content and its citation relationships, for which curator assignment uses the Personalized PageRank (PPR) algorithm while reward computation uses a multi-task peer-prediction mechanism. Our proposed CitedTCR bridges the literature on network-based and token-based recommender systems and contributes to the autonomous development of an evolving citation graph for high-quality content. Moreover, we experimentally confirm the incentive for registration and curation in CitedTCR using the simplification of a one-to-one correspondence between users and content (nodes).
民間部門との相互作用無き芸術祭は無意味である
- 現代美術は自分の仕事を美術史に刻むゲームである
- 美術史は民間部門と公共部門の相互作用を経て合意形成される
- ゆえに民間部門との相互作用無き芸術祭は無意味である
Ito and O’Dair (2019) “A Critical Examination of the Application of Blockchain Technology to Intellectual Property Management”
Abstract: This chapter critically investigates the application of blockchain technology for intellectual property management. To date, there have been relatively few critical discussions of the feasibility of utilising blockchain technology for this purpose, although much has been written, in media and industry sources, about the potential. Our aim, by contrast, is to examine possible limitations—and, subsequently, to suggest tentative solutions to the limitations we identify. Specifically, this chapter aims to examine the use of blockchain technology for intellectual property management from two perspectives: operation and implementation. We conclude that, while commentators often focus on technical characteristics of blockchain technology itself, it is the incentive design—which was fundamental to the original Bitcoin proposal—that is also critical to truly decentralised, and disintermediated, intellectual property management.